Lossy compression results on the New Test Images.
Results measure visual-quality of images compressed at
different bit-rates by various algorithms. Higher SSIM value
means better visual quality of compressed image.
Higher quality at same bit-rate means better
results. Click on the images to enlarge, you can enlarge multiple
images at same time.
You can also download numbers as tab separated text file.
artificial.ppm
3072x2048
|
Compression - Visual Quality
|
|
big_building.ppm
7216x5412
|
Compression - Visual Quality
|
|
big_tree.ppm
6088x4550
|
Compression - Visual Quality
|
|
bridge.ppm
2749x4049
|
Compression - Visual Quality
|
|
cathedral.ppm
2000x3008
|
Compression - Visual Quality
|
|
deer.ppm
4043x2641
|
Compression - Visual Quality
|
|
fireworks.ppm
3136x2352
|
Compression - Visual Quality
|
|
flower_foveon.ppm
2268x1512
|
Compression - Visual Quality
|
|
hdr.ppm
3072x2048
|
Compression - Visual Quality
|
|
leaves_iso_200.ppm
3008x2000
|
Compression - Visual Quality
|
|
leaves_iso_1600.ppm
3008x2000
|
Compression - Visual Quality
|
|
nightshot_iso_100.ppm
3136x2352
|
Compression - Visual Quality
|
|
nightshot_iso_1600.ppm
3136x2352
|
Compression - Visual Quality
|
|
spider_web.ppm
4256x2848
|
Compression - Visual Quality
|
|
zone_plate.ppm
3000x2000
|
Compression - Visual Quality
|
|
Implementations Used
- For Jpeg, IJG's open-source implenemtation
v6b was used with libpnm executables (Parameters:
-baseline -quality X)
- For Jpeg 2000, Kakadu v6.0 demo executables were
used (Parameters: -rate X)
- For HD Photo, MS DPK v1.0 was used (Parameters:
-c 9 -q X)
- For visual quality measurement,
TU Berlin implementation of SSIM by Felix Oum and Thomas
Richter was used
Let me know if you want to see some other
algorithm/implementation included in the benchmark. Goal is
not to be exhaustive and cover all
algorithms/implementations, the results must be interesting
enough.
|